Me -do you think I can open this image in every place in the city?
One man - Yes
Me- Let's reformulate the question: do you think I can open this image anywhere in the city without anyone being scandalized?
One man - I do not know this. I do not see why someone is scandalized with this image.
Me- ok, we repeat the question: do you think I can open this image anywhere in the city without anyone being scandalized?
One man - I do not think we should be scandalized.
Me - Ok, but for you there are people in the city that are scandalized, answer yes or no?
One man- Probably someone yes but ...
Me -Wait . You said probably yes. So I ask you: do you think even in the workplace there are people who are scandalized, or at home of my wife's parents do you think there are also there?
One man - It could also happen but ...
Me - Wait, do not always say but... As soon as you answer yes or not, ok? do you think I can open this image even knowing that maybe some of my relatives in my mother-in-law's house could be scandalized or in the workplace for example? In your opinion, I can open it, yes or not?
One man - But this does not mean that ....
Me - Wait, do not start another conversation,plz, just answer yes or not, ok?
One man - So... you can open it, yes, because there's nothing wrong with this image
Me - So, even knowing that someone is offended I can open it, is it that you affirm?
One man - We can not make ourselves condemned by society. Society can not define us, it can not limit our freedom of ..... bla bla bla bla bla bla.
Result: the person knew and could well understand that someone could be scandalized, perhaps your employer, or your client, with consequent loss of work, but this did not prevent the person to act according to his convictions and his way to think and run the risk of damaging his contact.
I know only one thing, I would not have done it, I would have put aside my ideas so as not to run the risk of causing harm to someone.
Just this, without even thinking about it more than a second.